The new western narrative (+ update)

A discussion:

Following Pepe Escobar, who is following this Davos meeting in detail, the narrative is changing.  Davos is the narrative engine, it is the place where the new narrative is  frozen in.

(This language comes from a psychological change process, where one uses mechanisms of unfreezing, change and re-freezing to pump in a new direction – Kurt Lewin’s 3-phase model of change).    They do not have time to use more complex models of change.

So, how is the narrative changing and how do I know?  There is of course some analysis involved, but Col, our farmer from NZ sent me some material to educate me regarding that little country.  Specifically, this video.  And I’m going to ask you to watch at least until 10 minutes in.

The professor knows he is lying.  How can we see that?  We can see that from his talking points that are western talking points which are expected, but specifically in the way that he covers each of those talking points.  He answers himself.  Example:  The issue of Ukraine being nazi comes up at about 6 minutes in.  The professor agrees, yes, there are nazis in Ukraine, but there are nazis everywhere and the nazis in Ukraine are not part of the Ukrainian administration as Zelensky is Jewish.  Neat, finished, all tied up in a bow, in a quite sufficient form that the normal listener can accept.  The normal listener will accept that explanation because it is easy and where someone may have had a question, they now have an answer.  The question gap is filled.  The talking points were given to him, and the response was given to him as well, and he is simply acting as a voice tunnel.

So, as the talking points appear in the video, it is nothing that I or you, the reader, have not heard before, i.e, nothing new, until wham bam!  the new narrative appears.  And you will see this narrative echoed at the WEF, Davos.

The new narrative appeared early only about a minute or so in, when the professor started talking about the rules-based international order, and I missed it.  Later on, about 10 minutes in he returns to this and describes a rules-based multi-lateral order, and I went back to the start.  As the video progresses, you will hear this professor saying that the rules-based (something) order is good for the smaller countries.  We know that this is not so.  It is good for control of the world, and is not good for the people of the world.  And we can only judge from what we’ve seen, as nobody has seen the rules in this order.  So, the rules are really fluffy sugar-spun candy that sounds good for the masses, but they do not exist and are made up on the spot.  This professor knows that, but he still spreads it.

The effectiveness of a move to a multi-polar world is good for medium and small countries.  The rules-based international order is stealing the narrative.  I wonder if they’ve asked any of the medium or small countries?  You can bet they did not.  This is what will become clear to all of us in the following period and it will be a difficult mess to explain to others.   It is just the same as the narrative being changed in Brazil, by people that do not even live there.  It is hard to turn around and explain.

The rules-based order is good for smaller countries is going to be a narrative that you see appearing over and over again, and you will see it at Davos, who collectively will pretend that they will save the world.  As this professor was not asked to explain the rules-based order, so nobody at the WEF will ask.. but what on earth happened to your wizz-bang Great Reset, and if that was a failure, why should we believe you now?    We’ve seen the words from there via Pepe Escobar:  THE NEW SYSTEM is the new Davos Mantra.  You know, the one that in combination with some kind of rules-based order, once they get their nomenclature right, will be good for all the medium and smaller countries and the one that does not exist, except in someone’s fevered imagination.  It is said that the escort agencies are booked solid for the Davos caper.  I guess we can conclude from this, that the high intelligence of these types does not manifest in good brainwork.

Yet, the multipolarity move is becoming very clear and it exists.  I guess these people have nothing to offer any longer, as I don’t see any of the medium and smaller countries believing them.  But we are in for this narrative change and it will be in a new soft and oh-so-helpful nomenclature used.  These people are painting themselves and hanging on their angel wings while waving more magic wands.  We’ve seen this so frequently, that the good is taken by these types of creatures and they try and make it their own.  An exceptional example of just this kind of process, this kind of sleight of hand, happened when the USA torture program became known.  By sleight of hand, it was changed into ‘waterboarding’ and Trump himself led the way, by saying he does not think waterboarding is so bad.  And at that moment, deep research into the torture program was deep-sixed.

We’re going to have to brush up on analysis skills and become miners for the gold nuggets in a world of deathly sugary fluffy spun candy.

Update:  Beep beep beep:  Here comes ET! 

Oh dear, I was wrong when I wrote this short piece.  It is not just cotton candy, it is positively off the planet.  “World Economic Forum’s Plans To ‘Save The Planet’ Almost ‘Extra Terrestrial’ — John Kerry.”  Speaking at the conference in Switzerland, the US climate change envoy said that WEF participants are a “select group of human beings.”  It is extraordinary, he says.   https://t.me/rtnews/35269

Detachment from reality is stark.